Advertisement
Journal of Oncology Practice  
Search for:
Limit by:
  Browse by Topic or Issue
Home Search or Browse JOP Subscriptions PDA Services E-mail Alerts Customer Service

Journal of Oncology Practice, Vol 5, No 4 (July), 2009: pp. 188-192
© 2009 American Society of Clinical Oncology.
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.0942006

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response to this article
Right arrow Purchase Article
Right arrow View Shopping Cart
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRights & Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buswell, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, L. N.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Buswell, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shulman, L. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Original Research

Provider Practice Models in Ambulatory Oncology Practice: Analysis of Productivity, Revenue, and Provider and Patient Satisfaction

Lori A. Buswell, MS, NP, OCN, Patricia Reid Ponte, RN, DNSc, FAAN, Lawrence N. Shulman, MD

Departments of Nursing and Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Corresponding author: Lawrence N. Shulman, MD, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115; e-mail: Lawrence_Shulman{at}dfci.harvard.edu.

Introduction: Physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), and physician assistants (PAs) frequently work as collaborative teams in oncology, and the models of practice vary. Optimizing the models for quality of care, provider and patient satisfaction, productivity, and revenue will be critical in the years to come, as stresses on the oncology workforce increase.

Methods: Teams of physicians, NPs, and PAs at the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (Boston, MA) were studied with regard to practice models and their effects on productivity, visit fees, and provider and patient satisfaction.

Results: Three practice models were identified, dependent on the degree to which providers saw patients together with team members or independently. Overall productivity and visit fees were similar in the three models. In addition, provider and patient satisfaction levels were high in all models.

Conclusions: Varying models of practice among physicians, NPs, and PAs lead to relatively similar levels of productivity and fees as well as provider and patient satisfaction. It is paramount that in the years to come—as the demand for oncology services increases more rapidly than the number of providers—provider teams develop new strategies and care models with even broader participation by other members of the health care system to work more efficiently.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




About
JOP
 Editorial
Roster
 Advertising
Information
 Librarians &
Institutions
 Rights &
Permissions
 Site Map

Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Online ISSN: 1935-469X. Print ISSN: 1554-7477
Terms and Conditions of Use
  HighWire Press HighWire Press™ assists in the publication of JOP Online