This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response to this article Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Rights & Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Jacobsen, P. B. Articles by Malafa, M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Jacobsen, P. B. Articles by Malafa, M. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

Measuring Quality of Care in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: The Moffitt Quality Practice Initiative

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL; Space Coast Medical Associates, Titusville, FL; Center for Cancer Care and Research, Lakeland, FL; and Sarasota Memorial Hospital, Sarasota, FL

Corresponding author: Paul B. Jacobsen, PhD, Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Dr, MRC-PSY, Tampa, FL 33612; jacobsen{at}moffitt.usf.edu

Purpose: The Moffitt Quality Practice Initiative (MQPI) is a practice-based system of quality self-assessment, the ultimate goal of which is to improve the quality of cancer care at a statewide level. The initial phase of this project focused on developing procedures, determining feasibility, and evaluating utility for assessing quality of care for colorectal cancer within an existing affiliate network.

Patients and Methods: Representatives from four oncology groups selected quality measures consistent with evidence-, consensus-, and safety-based guidelines that could be abstracted from medical records. Trained abstractors then reviewed records of all eligible colorectal patients seen by each practice in 2004. Frequencies of responses for each indicator were tabulated for overall and practice-specific level of adherence and were compared among practices.

Results: Adherence was uniformly high for several indicators, including confirmatory pathology report, staging information, and chemotherapy discussion or recommendation. Lower adherence was evident across practices for performance of carcinoembryonic tests and complete colonoscopic evaluations. Significant variation among practices was evident only for consent for chemotherapy.

Conclusion: The initial phase of MQPI demonstrated the feasibility and utility of assessing quality indicators for colorectal cancer among members of an existing affiliate network. Findings identified areas where adherence to care was uniformly high, but also identified areas where both overall and practice-specific adherence were less than optimal. These efforts lay the groundwork for expanding MQPI in several directions that have in common the potential to improve the quality of cancer care on a statewide basis.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. W. Blayney, K. McNiff, D. Hanauer, G. Miela, D. Markstrom, and M. Neuss Implementation of the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative at a University Comprehensive Cancer Center J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2009; 27(23): 3802 - 3807. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]