This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Purchase Article View Shopping Cart Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Motl, S. E. Articles by Gladney, T. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Motl, S. E. Articles by Gladney, T. J.

Racial Comparison of Outcomes and Costs for Inpatient Neutropenic Patients: A Multicenter Evaluation

University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy and Baptist Memorial Healthcare, Memphis, TN

Corresponding author: Susannah E. Motl, PharmD, University of Tennessee College of Pharmacy, 875 Monroe Avenue, Suite 112, Memphis, TN 38163, smotl{at}utmem.edu

PURPOSE: Racial disparities have been reported in the care and outcome of cancer patients. We evaluated whether race would influence the cost and outcomes of inpatient neutropenic cancer patients in a multicenter study from a large health care system in the southern United States.

METHODS: Data was collected on all cancer inpatients with a diagnosis code for neutropenia in a 16-hospital system between October 1, 2002, and September 30, 2003. Demographics, treatment outcomes, and costs were compared between white and minority patients. A P value less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS: Two hundred seventy-nine cancer patients (0.29% of all admits) had a diagnosis of neutropenia. Demographics were similar between white and minority patients. However, minorities were more likely to be younger than whites (P = .002). With regards to outcomes, length of stay (LOS), LOS in the intensive care unit, and discharge status were not statistically different. Total hospital, medication, laboratory, radiation, surgery, and respiratory costs were also similar (P > .05), although minorities were less likely to receive myeloid colony-stimulating factors (P = .032) and more likely to have higher nursing care costs (P = .048).

CONCLUSION: In light of the escalating reports of racial disparities in cancer care, these minimal differences are encouraging.